<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The New Mexico Independent - Latest Comments in TODAY&amp;#8217;S TOP STORIES: Domenici opposes immunity takeaway proposal</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nmindependent.disqus.com/today8217s_top_stories_domenici_opposes_immunity_takeaway_proposal_86/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:13:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TODAY&amp;#8217;S TOP STORIES: Domenici opposes immunity takeaway proposal</title><link>http://70.32.121.217/772/todays-top-stories-domenici-opposes-immunity-takeaway-proposal#comment-2502041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. If they haven't done anything wrong then why would they need retroactive immunity? Gosh, now where have I heard something similar before? If you don't have anything to hide ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IOKIYAR!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But alas the Republicans (i.e. Pete) are bowing to their corporate masters with the Democrats aiding and abetting this legal sorcery. Shame on them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thegrandpanjandrum</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>