-
Website
http://newmexicoindependent.com -
Original page
http://70.32.121.217/218/the-dnc-drifts-into-history -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
benito_a
94 comments · 22 points
-
new_mexican
190 comments · 9 points
-
Jeeter
91 comments · 5 points
-
JoMa
228 comments · 11 points
-
Gnarlodious
88 comments · 10 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
To sin tax or not to sin tax
3 days ago · 45 comments
-
Denish says allegation about Christmas cards a ‘patently false lie’
2 days ago · 14 comments
-
Denish, running for governor, steps into budgetary fray
3 days ago · 15 comments
-
Howl-o-ween for journalism
1 week ago · 43 comments
-
Lujan says he’s listened to his constituents on health care reform
1 day ago · 5 comments
-
To sin tax or not to sin tax
Wow, did I miss something - when did the left wing of the Democratic party start pushing individual responsibility ("we are responsible for ourselves"). Their message has always been one of governmental responsibility in the past (welfare, government-run healthcare, etc.).
And since when does Obama use Genesis as the foundation for public policy ("the fundamental belief that I am my brother's keeper", see Genesis 4:9)? Last I heard, he was ridiculing the Old Testament and cherry-picking parts of verses to demonstrate that the Bible could not be used to guide our public policy (http://www.youtube.com/v/4FCNKwHRCQM).
it's about blending shared values in the service of progressive policies. i would have used "shared responsibility" rather than "mutual responsibility."
It's each of our individual responsibilities to work to make sure our shared promise is realized through a sense of shared responsibility to our communities, the future and our children.
As for mutual responsibility, that's a very biblical theme. I am sure you know the Bible makes many more references to taking care of the widow and the orphan than it does to prohibiting action on same-sex attractions. The debate, of course, in American political debate is how to execute that very human action -- taking care of the least of these -- through government intervention or through the bonds that we as human beings feel toward one another and the community. One could argue that the debate is complicated by America's emphasis on individualism throughout its history. But again I will leave that to much smarter people to find the answer to striking a balance.
Whatever your feelings of Cornell West, he made a very strong case (as an Obama supporter, btw) that the narrative to date on Obama and race has been in essence a white narrative, or POV, if you will. Meaning, the barometer of success (or not) in speaking to this issue has wildly swamped the narrative from African Americans.
The clearest example is this notion of a white narrative driving his angle on race is that Obama cannot risk talking straight at AA issues lest he spook off white fence sitters. This is now accepted as fact.
We'll see how this plays out. What I do know is there will be very little reporting on how this narrative is working in the AA community, which is much more nuanced than one might think on first blush, considering the 90 plus percent of support he is receiving in the AA community.