<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The New Mexico Independent - Latest Comments in NM attorney Pat Rogers gets Talking Points Memo treatment</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:48:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NM attorney Pat Rogers gets Talking Points Memo treatment</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/5894/nm-attorney-pat-rogers-gets-talking-points-memo-treatment#comment-3278540</link><description>More projection from the Republican Party.  Whenever the GOP or its lap mouths start complaining about the Liberals or the Democrats, they're usually talking about themselves.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chupacabra</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NM attorney Pat Rogers gets Talking Points Memo treatment</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/5894/nm-attorney-pat-rogers-gets-talking-points-memo-treatment#comment-3210813</link><description>So, Mr Rogers, are you going to arrest these persons that have used &lt;br&gt;the same Social Security number fraudulently, or just move your mouth?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and by the way, as an Attorney you should be able to differentiate&lt;br&gt;between voter registration fraud and voter fraud.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;donavon</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">donavon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NM attorney Pat Rogers gets Talking Points Memo treatment</title><link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/5894/nm-attorney-pat-rogers-gets-talking-points-memo-treatment#comment-3205537</link><description>So let's hope that the Department of Justice notes that Pat Rogers is part of the national GOP scam to suppress voter participation in various key states, such as New Mexico. This should be prosecutable under the RICO act as multi-state mob-style criminal activity designed to subvert the American electoral process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Rogers has any actual evidence why doesn't he show it in public rather than make apparently baseless public accusations? Where's the beef, Rogers? Not even your own Republican US Attorney found any evidence last time you cried wolf!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeeter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:02:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>