Community Page
- newmexicoindependent.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- Ex-U.S. Rep. Steve Pearce announces he will run for his old seat
- Pearce announcement sets up congressional clash with Teague
- Congressman Lujan is out of step with northern N.M. on illegal immigration
- Health care is broken, but the government can’t fix it
- TODAY’S BLOG ROUNDUP: Even more Tea Party post mortems
-
Recent Comments
- How is this being placed on the "progressive movement". Marty and his minions are far from progressive.
- Hooray for you. Finally someone speaks out about what "real" news is. We have all grieved Michael but for now, let him rest in peace. Who's going to get his children is a family...
- Thanks for equating blue collar workers to thugs. Think of that when you see these hard working people out there doing their jobs that usually end up benefiting you in some way.
- Typical behavior from the thug division of the progressive movement.
- Update on the pool story: http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Campers-Complexion-No-Problem-for-New-Pool.html. The "free candy and ice-cream-making" detail breaks my heart. It...
Jump to original thread »
Darren White entered the race for New Mexico’s 1st Congressional District with better name recognition than his Democratic opponent, Martin Heinrich, and one of the best backgrounds a candidate can have â law enforcement. So it was little surprise when White’s cam
... Continue reading »
9 months ago
9 months ago
I mean, if Dan Foley's only semi-readable "columns" are accepted by the NM Independent, they will probably not refuse anything.
9 months ago
OH and Jeeter if it weren't for originalism, Marbury v. Madison could not stand. Because without the originalism there can be no Constitutionally limited govt. and therein no judicial review.
So lets hear some more of you partisan rhetoric.....Tell me why Bush being a screw-up entitles you to be a socialist partisan hack that tramples the very nature of our Constitutional government by expanding entitlements and taxation. Tell me why Bush being a moron entitles congressional democrats to receive large sums from the very financial firms that have destroyed our economy and then bail them out.
Come on, cause I want to hear more of why the fact the failings of a corrupt GOP party entitle, no require, the American people to instead voting for a the tried and failed corrupt Democrat party. Why should the American people have to choose from either of your failed parties. I hope with all my heart that the American people will soon wake up and toss all you partisan bums out. I can't stand corrupt hypocritical neo-con GOP'ers anymore than I stomach elitist hyprocritical corrupt democrats like yourself. And if the independent had any scruples or a sense of fair play they would be showing us how both candidates in CD-1 are piss poor choices, instead of clearly endorsing one piss poor candidate over the other while claiming impartiality in their reporting.
Toss all the Republicans and Democrats out, don't vote for either party.
Have a nice day!
9 months ago
Now I can understand how people would make assumptions about others, given a lack of information, but I think I'm too broke to be elitist, being one paycheck away from bankruptcy these days.
I'm not too jaded with the political process to hope that conventional candidates I support will change America for the better, and I certainly trust corporations much less than the US government and have for a long time. I've worked for them and relying on them to do anything for the common good is laughable. So call me a socialist rather than a corporatist, because I believe in the ultimate power of the people to change the country for the good. My faith in Wal Mart to expand the social good in the US? Not so much!
And if it helps your blood pressure any, I too would love to see more acceptance of more parties besides the GOP and the Dems, more competition in the political market.
From what I've seen, the only way to open our political process to multiple parties is to get instant-runoff elections. Give everyone the chance to rank their vote (#1 Green, #2 GOP, #3 Nihilist) for a Libertarian, Green, Bull Moose, or Nihilist candidate but then if that candidate loses, their second choice candidate vote is activated. And so on down their list. (check out instant-runoff voting in Wikipedia for more details)
This system - which is a lot simpler than it sounds - is in place in a few countries around the world and municipalities in the US. It encourages new ideas and new candidates to enter the political process without having to work their way through the two main parties' systems. Have you read about this? You can't throw the bums out without a plan and instant runoff voting is a decent plan, I think.
The two parties have had a stranglehold on the American population too long, and it seems like a two-way race to the bottom. I agree with you, TJ, godblessya. We should be opening our political process to more not less influence of the people. More Democracy, not less!
9 months ago
9 months ago
9 months ago
9 months ago