DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! The New Mexico Independent is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

The New Mexico Independent

Jump to original thread »
Author

Green growth gambit

Started by nmindependent · 9 months ago

ALBUQUERQUE — Depending on whom you talk to, five new zoning codes currently being considered by Albuquerque’s Environmental Planning Commission are either a positive step forward, toward less sprawl and more transit-oriented development, or they’re potentially ... Continue reading »

3 comments

  • odonnell

    10 months ago

    Louis Kolker is right. So is Isaac. And the neighborhood associations.

    This new form-based code is a great plan. Just what ABQ needs. That said, a healthy, inclusive planning process must also be part of that code. Neighborhoods need to be respected but they cant run roughshod over the needs of the entire city and the city cannot simply tell them what to do. There needs to be a process so that the needs of the city and the neighborhoods are met.

    Excellent article, BTW.
    reply
  • pancheetah

    10 months ago

    I wish the proposals were less close to form based "moaning" and a little closer to per-form-ance based zoning. It's time to hold businesses more accountable for the changes they bring. Ehrenreich makes this point but says that it's hard to find many good examples of communities that have set standards for the kinds of business practices they want in their communities.
    reply
  • pjdahl

    9 months ago

    Any city, Albuquerque included, has to be very careful applying form based codes as regulatory praxis. The concept of form based code invokes a city where, quoting Evan McKenzie, “homogeneity, exclusiveness, and exclusion are the foundation of social organization” (McKenzie, 1994, p. 177). Hence, my argument is that this model of regulation counteracts diversity of people, ideas, and possibilities. The concept of form based code basically won’t apply to the premises of urbanization.

    /PJD
    reply
Please login to comment.
Returning? Login