-
Website
http://newmexicoindependent.com -
Original page
http://70.32.121.217/575/double-ditch-mrgcd-ditches-ditch-trail-program -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
benito_a
94 comments · 22 points
-
new_mexican
190 comments · 9 points
-
Jeeter
91 comments · 5 points
-
JoMa
228 comments · 11 points
-
Gnarlodious
88 comments · 10 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
To sin tax or not to sin tax
3 days ago · 45 comments
-
Denish says allegation about Christmas cards a ‘patently false lie’
2 days ago · 14 comments
-
Denish, running for governor, steps into budgetary fray
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
Howl-o-ween for journalism
1 week ago · 43 comments
-
Lujan says he’s listened to his constituents on health care reform
1 day ago · 5 comments
-
To sin tax or not to sin tax
I was shocked that a the vitriol generated by a small (albeit well-organized) neighborhood association could scuttle a project that so clearly stands to benefit so many people in Albuquerque. We live in a time when we are frantically searching for alternatives to gas-powered transportation, more opportunities for physical recreation, and locally-produced foods. The Conservancy District could have used the acequia system, at the nexus of all these issues, to move Bernalillo County forward. They chose to do the opposite, to block all the neighborhood associations (and the MRCOG), who included the ditches in their plans for bike and pedestrian trails, the educators and land stewards who wish to organize stewardship programs, and the parents and teachers who are looking for safer ways for their kids to walk or bike to school.
The Board clearly had their minds made up before they came to the meeting, and made no effort to control the heckling crowd, who actually boo'ed the woman from Bernalillo County Parks and Recreation, while she was explaining the overrun costs of the bridge. I wonder how many Conservancy District ratepayers who are not irrigators feel about being told that their only benefit from their tax dollars, recreational use of the ditch trails, is STILL not legal, and that as irrigation ceases, ditches will close, and FU if you don't like it. To me, the Conservancy District is radically shortsighted not to realize that without recreation as a secondary purpose, its own usefulness as an agency is short-lived. As one of those non-irrigating taxpayers, I know I don't want to support such a backward agency.