<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The New Mexico Independent - Latest Comments in CD2: Urlacher suits up for Teague</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:16:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CD2: Urlacher suits up for Teague</title><link>http://70.32.121.217/1300/cd2-urlacher-suits-up-for-teague#comment-2501734</link><description>Actualy, Gunssavelives, the picture is from his media day appearance ahead of the Bears' Super Bowl appearance. You can tell by the Super Bowl XLI patch he is wearing. He is also speaking into a NFL Network microphone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matthewreichbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:16:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CD2: Urlacher suits up for Teague</title><link>http://70.32.121.217/1300/cd2-urlacher-suits-up-for-teague#comment-2501735</link><description>I wonder what the Chicago Bears' management thinks about Urlacher wearing their team jersey while making this endorsement. By doing this, he's giving the impression that the team endorses Teague. On second thought, I guess that they're OK with it -- after all, he's apparently allowed to use the NFL logo when making political endorsements, judging by the photo above. What I'd like to know is &lt;b&gt;where are the "adbuster" whiners complaining about product placement and celebrity endorsements with this one?&lt;/b&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gunssavelives</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>